Senate Passes Historic Patent Reform Bill
0 Comments - 09 Mar 2011
The Senate yesterday passed the America Invents Act (S. 23) by a vote of 87-3. Although some provisions were dropped, the Senate bill retained the following key elements: Third party submissions of prior art for pending applications; USPTO fee setting authority; Supplemental examination authority; Repeal of the residency requirement for Federal Ci...

More Link
Senate Defeats Feinstein Patent Amendment
0 Comments - 03 Mar 2011
An amendment that was offered by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) to the patent reform bill (America Invents Act S. 23) has been tabled by a vote of 87 to 13. The Feinstein Amendment removed the First To File provision in favor of the existing First to Invent System.  Arguments against the First to File System include not allowing independent...

More Link

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Hold on to your Blackberrry – More Damages to pay?

As you may recall, in 2006 Research in Motion (RIM), the owner of Blackberry, paid $612.5 million to patent owner NTP to settle a patent infringement lawsuit.
The US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Richmond, VA in September heard a Freedom of Information Act (”FOIA”) based lawsuit filed by NTP.  The lawsuit is intended to uncover details about the relationship between RIM and the US Department of Justice at the time of the 2006 settlement.
The US Government was the largest user of Blackberry’s and relied upon their reliable secure data functionality.  What NTP lawyers did not know at the time of the settlement was the Justice Department had entered into a “common-interest” agreement with RIM to advance governement interests in the patent infringement dispute.
The Justice Department allegedly withheld over 300 documents related to the effect of injunction on government Blackberrys.
Although common interest agreements are legal, questions remain concerning whether the terms of the deal should have remain private to NTP.  RIM may face additional pressure if the documents from the FOIA suit are revealed and additional limitations may be placed on the use of common interest agreements that effect settlement agreements between adverse parties.

0 comments:

Post a Comment